✅Fact Checking Skills

Browse the best Fact Checking skills for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and other AI agents.

70 skills · Page 1 of 3

fact-check

jwynia's avatarfrom jwynia★ 3

Verify claims in generated output against sources. Use as a separate pass AFTER content generation to catch hallucinations. Critical constraint - cannot be reliably combined with generation in a single pass.

epistemic-checkpoint

ANcpLua's avatarfrom ANcpLua★ 1

Force verification before answering questions involving versions, dates, status, or "current"state. Prevents hallucinations at the REASONING level by checking assertions.yaml and WebSearchbefore forming beliefs. Triggers on software versions, release status, dates, and package versions.

wolf-verification

Nice-Wolf-Studio's avatarfrom Nice-Wolf-Studio

Three-layer verification architecture (CoVe, HSP, RAG) for self-verification, fact-checking, and hallucination prevention

prove-it

tkersey's avatarfrom tkersey★ 30

Gauntlet for absolute claims (always/never/guaranteed/optimal); pressure-test, then refine with explicit boundaries.

critique

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000★ 5

Engage in rigorous intellectual scrutiny of ideas and reasoning through systematic challenge and questioning. Use this skill when explicitly asked to critique, challenge, or rigorously analyze ideas, arguments, proposals, or reasoning. Apply when the user requests critical analysis, wants their assumptions questioned, or asks for intellectually honest feedback that prioritizes truth over comfort.

factchecker

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000★ 5

Systematically verify claims in code comments, documentation, commit messages, and naming conventions. Extracts assertions, validates with evidence (code analysis, web search, documentation, execution), generates report with bibliography. Use when: reviewing code changes, auditing documentation accuracy, validating technical claims before merge, or user says "verify claims", "factcheck", "audit documentation", "validate comments", "are these claims accurate".

self-consistency

bnadlerjr's avatarfrom bnadlerjr★ 2

INVOKE for verification and high-stakes decisions. Produces multiple independent reasoning paths with consensus check. Use before finalizing critical work. Triggers: verification, double-checking, validating approaches, high-stakes implementations where errors are costly.

verified-information-generator

ljchg12-hue's avatarfrom ljchg12-hue

Verified information generation and validation

first-principles

Jonely235's avatarfrom Jonely235

Independent thinking framework using first-principles reasoning to break down problems, evaluate opinions, make decisions, and find truth without relying on authority, social proof, or conventional wisdom. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Analyze problems from fundamental truths instead of accepting assumptions, (2) Evaluate arguments and opinions to identify logical fallacies and hidden premises, (3) Make decisions based on first principles rather than following others, (4) Cut through controversial debates to find underlying truths, (5) Think independently instead of accepting conventional wisdom

deep-investigation-protocol

bogheorghiu's avatarfrom bogheorghiu

"What is REALLY at stake here? And for whom?" - STOP. When the matter involves trustworthiness, purchasing decisions, "which is better or more reliable", brand comparisons, marketing claims, corporate behavior, "convince me otherwise", or post-purchase "was this good?" - USE THIS. For technical specs affecting quality (TLC vs QLC, component sourcing) use Light Touch mode. Search and verify even if you think you know. Does NOT trigger for: what to watch/eat/wear, how-to instructions, when/where/who founded, or explicit "just tell me quick."

fact-check

leonardomso's avatarfrom leonardomso★ 66.0k

Verify technical accuracy of JavaScript concept pages by checking code examples, MDN/ECMAScript compliance, and external resources to prevent misinformation

fact-checker

daymade's avatarfrom daymade★ 154

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

citation-validator

liangdabiao's avatarfrom liangdabiao★ 108

验证研究报告中所有声明的引用准确性、来源质量和格式规范性。确保每个事实性声明都有可验证的来源,并提供来源质量评级。当最终确定研究报告、审查他人研究、发布或分享研究之前使用此技能。

source-tracing

hacket's avatarfrom hacket★ 12

从高熵的二手内容中回溯到低熵、权威、原始的信息源。 该技能通过结构化步骤,帮助用户验证消息真伪、理解原始语境, 建立独立的信息判断与溯源能力。

journalist-analyst

rysweet's avatarfrom rysweet★ 10

Analyzes events through journalistic lens using 5 Ws and H, investigative methods, source evaluation,fact-checking, newsworthiness criteria, and ethical journalism principles.Provides insights on story angles, information gaps, credibility, public interest, and media framing.Use when: Breaking news, information verification, source analysis, story development, media criticism.Evaluates: Factual accuracy, source credibility, completeness, newsworthiness, bias, public interest.

scout-mindset-bias-check

lyndonkl's avatarfrom lyndonkl★ 8

Use to detect and remove cognitive biases from reasoning. Invoke when prediction feels emotional, stuck at 50/50, or when you want to validate forecasting process. Use when user mentions scout mindset, soldier mindset, bias check, reversal test, scope sensitivity, or cognitive distortions.

research-claim-map

lyndonkl's avatarfrom lyndonkl★ 8

Use when verifying claims before decisions, fact-checking statements against sources, conducting due diligence on vendor/competitor assertions, evaluating conflicting evidence, triangulating source credibility, assessing research validity for literature reviews, investigating misinformation, rating evidence strength (primary vs secondary), identifying knowledge gaps, or when user mentions "fact-check", "verify this", "is this true", "evaluate sources", "conflicting evidence", or "due diligence".

source-credibility-analyzer

DNYoussef's avatarfrom DNYoussef★ 8

Assess credibility, bias, and reliability of sources with explicit criteria and confidence ceilings.

dismech-references

monarch-initiative's avatarfrom monarch-initiative★ 6

Skill for validating and repairing evidence references in the dismech knowledge base. Use this skill when working with evidence items in disorder YAML files, validating that snippet text matches PubMed abstracts, and repairing misquoted or fabricated evidence. Critical for ensuring scientific accuracy and preventing AI hallucinations.

critical-biblical-listener

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000★ 5

Evaluate sermon content from a biblically literate perspective. Assess theological accuracy, scriptural alignment, and exegetical integrity. Identify where claims may overextend biblical support, misapply context, or import assumptions not evident in the text. Use when reviewing sermons, Bible teachings, or theological content for biblical faithfulness.

citation

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000★ 5

Formats citations and validates source attribution for answers generated from multiple document sources (ChromaDB and web search). Use when adding source references to generated answers, validating citation accuracy, or ensuring quality of source attribution across different source types.

content-validator

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000★ 5

Validate that written content accurately reflects source materials.LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: User says "驗證", "validate", "檢查準確性", "核對" | after writing notes/reports | ensuring content accuracy.CAPABILITIES: Source-target comparison, citation verification, fact checking, consistency check.

blog-fact-checking

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000★ 5

Verify claims against referenced sources. Checks if blog content accurately represents external resources, APIs, or documentation.Trigger phrases: "fact check", "verify", "check claims", "verify claims", "check sources", "verify sources"

docs-validating-factual-accuracy

wahidyankf's avatarfrom wahidyankf★ 4

Universal methodology for verifying factual correctness in documentation using WebSearch and WebFetch tools. Covers command syntax verification, version checking, code example validation, API correctness, confidence classification system ([Verified], [Error], [Outdated], [Unverified]), source prioritization, and update frequency rules. Essential for maintaining factual accuracy in technical documentation and educational content

← Back to All Skills