✅Fact Checking Skills
Browse skills in the Fact Checking category.
verify-dark
Verify dark earthquake claims against fault databases. Use when checking if a candidate earthquake is truly "dark" (unmapped fault) or just pre-historical (known fault). Triggers on "verify dark", "check fault database", "is this dark", "audit earthquake claim".
evidence-collection
Collect, format, and cite evidence for LeadFraud.org. Use this skill when gathering G2 reviews, traffic data, or documenting patterns to ensure proper attribution and credibility.
qa-audit
Quality auditor for Source Library. Prioritizes verifying original language texts (not modern translations), auditing metadata accuracy against title pages, USTC alignment, and translation quality. Use for systematic quality control or to identify modern translations that should be replaced with originals.
citation-validator
验证研究报告中所有声明的引用准确性、来源质量和格式规范性。确保每个事实性声明都有可验证的来源，并提供来源质量评级。当最终确定研究报告、审查他人研究、发布或分享研究之前使用此技能。
research-validation
Multi-source validation framework for technology decisions, best practices verification, and evidence-based implementation
critical-thinking
Analyze arguments, detect biases, evaluate claims, and improve reasoning. Use when asked to fact-check, identify logical fallacies, evaluate arguments, analyze predictions, find root causes, or think adversarially about plans. Triggers include "evaluate this argument", "logical fallacies", "fact check", "analyze the claims", "identify biases", "devil's advocate", "red team this", "root cause".
research-verified
전문 검증 검색 - 신뢰도 라벨, 출처 교차 검증, 한국 맥락 최적화
claim-investigation
Systematically investigate social media claims and viral content. Use when fact-checking complex claims, when decomposing multi-part assertions, or when investigating narratives that mix facts with interpretation.
verified-source-db
검증된 출처 데이터베이스 - 자동 신뢰도 평가 & 출처 추천
verified-information-generator
Verified information generation and validation
batch-report-generator
Generate GenuVerity fact-check reports from structured input (Gemini research output). Use /batch-report to process research into HTML reports. Optimized for token efficiency - expects pre-researched sources.
fact-checking
Use when reviewing code changes, auditing documentation accuracy, validating technical claims before merge, or user says "verify claims", "factcheck", "audit documentation", "validate comments", "are these claims accurate".
source-verification
Journalism source verification and fact-checking workflows. Use when verifying claims, checking source credibility, investigating social media accounts, reverse image searching, or building verification trails. Essential for reporters, fact-checkers, and researchers working with unverified information.
self-consistency
INVOKE for verification and high-stakes decisions. Produces multiple independent reasoning paths with consensus check. Use before finalizing critical work. Triggers: verification, double-checking, validating approaches, high-stakes implementations where errors are costly.
verify-and-add-sources
Verifies claims have proper citations, searches for sources if needed, and adds them to references.qmd. Use when making factual claims or adding statistics.
critical-biblical-listener
Evaluate sermon content from a biblically literate perspective. Assess theological accuracy, scriptural alignment, and exegetical integrity. Identify where claims may overextend biblical support, misapply context, or import assumptions not evident in the text. Use when reviewing sermons, Bible teachings, or theological content for biblical faithfulness.
fact-find
Quick lookup of specific facts about Bottlerocket with citations
citation
Formats citations and validates source attribution for answers generated from multiple document sources (ChromaDB and web search). Use when adding source references to generated answers, validating citation accuracy, or ensuring quality of source attribution across different source types.
content-validator
Validate that written content accurately reflects source materials.LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: User says "驗證", "validate", "檢查準確性", "核對" | after writing notes/reports | ensuring content accuracy.CAPABILITIES: Source-target comparison, citation verification, fact checking, consistency check.
critique
Engage in rigorous intellectual scrutiny of ideas and reasoning through systematic challenge and questioning. Use this skill when explicitly asked to critique, challenge, or rigorously analyze ideas, arguments, proposals, or reasoning. Apply when the user requests critical analysis, wants their assumptions questioned, or asks for intellectually honest feedback that prioritizes truth over comfort.
factchecker
Systematically verify claims in code comments, documentation, commit messages, and naming conventions. Extracts assertions, validates with evidence (code analysis, web search, documentation, execution), generates report with bibliography. Use when: reviewing code changes, auditing documentation accuracy, validating technical claims before merge, or user says "verify claims", "factcheck", "audit documentation", "validate comments", "are these claims accurate".
blog-fact-checking
Verify claims against referenced sources. Checks if blog content accurately represents external resources, APIs, or documentation.Trigger phrases: "fact check", "verify", "check claims", "verify claims", "check sources", "verify sources"
fact-checker
Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.
fact-check
Verify technical accuracy of JavaScript concept pages by checking code examples, MDN/ECMAScript compliance, and external resources to prevent misinformation
wolf-verification
Three-layer verification architecture (CoVe, HSP, RAG) for self-verification, fact-checking, and hallucination prevention
critical-feedback
This skill enables honest, pressure-tested feedback on ideas, decisions, and proposals. Use this skill when prompted for an opinion on whether something is a good idea, should be done, or what to think about an approach.
competitive-analysis-quality-assurance
Systematic fact-checking, source verification, and quality assurance for competitive research deliverables. This skill ONLY activates when explicitly requested - it does not auto-trigger. Use this skill when you explicitly ask to review competitive research, fact-check claims, verify sources, validate consistency, or assess quality of completed analysis documents. Example requests that activate this skill "review this competitive analysis", "fact-check these findings", "verify the sources", "quality check this report", "are these claims accurate", or "validate this analysis".
fact-checking-self-assessment
Provides automated fact-checking, quality assessment, and self-validation capabilities for AI outputs. Use this skill when you need to verify factual claims, assess implementation quality, or ensure outputs meet production standards before delivery.
blog-fact-checking
Verify claims against referenced sources. Checks if blog content accurately represents external resources, APIs, or documentation.Trigger phrases: "fact check", "verify", "check claims", "verify claims", "check sources", "verify sources"
research-fact-checker
Research topics, verify facts, check historical accuracy, and validate technical details. Use when writing non-fiction, historical fiction, or any content requiring factual accuracy.
research-fact-checker
Assists authors in researching topics, verifying facts, and ensuring accuracy in their writing. Particularly useful for historical fiction, non-fiction, science fiction, and any genre requiring real-world accuracy. Use when the user needs help with research or fact-checking.
anti-fabrication
Ensure factual accuracy by validating claims through tool execution, avoiding superlatives and unsubstantiated metrics, and marking uncertain information appropriately
claim-ledger-to-tasks
扫描 topic 的 digests Claim Ledger，把“未核验 + 数字高影响”条目转成 tasks（核验待办）。
nci-manipulation-analysis
Analyzes content for manipulation techniques using the NCI (Narrative Credibility Index) Protocol. Detects emotional manipulation, suspicious timing, uniform messaging, tribal division, and missing information across 20 categories. Use when asked to analyze content for manipulation, propaganda, disinformation patterns, or when user provides a URL or text asking "is this manipulative?", "analyze this for bias", "check for propaganda", or similar requests.
citation
Formats citations and validates source attribution for answers generated from multiple document sources (ChromaDB and web search). Use when adding source references to generated answers, validating citation accuracy, or ensuring quality of source attribution across different source types.
content-validator
Validate that written content accurately reflects source materials.LOAD THIS SKILL WHEN: User says "驗證", "validate", "檢查準確性", "核對" | after writing notes/reports | ensuring content accuracy.CAPABILITIES: Source-target comparison, citation verification, fact checking, consistency check.
tech-reviewer
技术卡片审核。验证问题卡片/知识卡片的准确性，查找资料核实，指出错误并提供改进建议。当用户说「review」「审核」「检查」技术文档时使用。适用于 tech/ 目录。
verify-known-issues
Verify claims about known issues in libraries or tools. Use when about to state something is a "known issue", "known bug", or "known limitation".
critical-validator
This skill should be used when validating user prompts, plans, or requests before execution. It conducts independent validation, questions assumptions, references official sources and documentation, identifies potential issues, and presents revised recommendations to ensure accuracy and completeness.
fact-checker
Verify claims in tacosdedatos content before publication. Use this skill when reviewing drafts for factual accuracy, checking code examples work correctly, validating statistics and sources, or verifying quotes and attributions. Produces a structured fact-check report with verdicts for each claim. For deep verification requiring extended research, delegate to the fact-checker subagent instead.
verified-search
Expert verified search with source validation, credibility scoring, and fact-checking
first-principles
Independent thinking framework using first-principles reasoning to break down problems, evaluate opinions, make decisions, and find truth without relying on authority, social proof, or conventional wisdom. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Analyze problems from fundamental truths instead of accepting assumptions, (2) Evaluate arguments and opinions to identify logical fallacies and hidden premises, (3) Make decisions based on first principles rather than following others, (4) Cut through controversial debates to find underlying truths, (5) Think independently instead of accepting conventional wisdom
truthfulness-check
Enforce honest, evidence-bound answers. Use when the user asks to be honest/truthful, expresses frustration or urgency, or when confidence is low and errors are costly.
verify-content
文章の事実確認と参照検証を行う統合スキル。主張の洗い出し、外部ソースでの検証、参考文献の整備までを一貫して実行。文書レビュー、記事校正、レポート確認、学術論文チェック時に使用。
iterative-verification
"Is this ACTUALLY verified, or did I just say it is?" - Ralph-wiggum methodology applied to factual accuracy. Use when (1) claims require evidence not assumption, (2) verification must be demonstrable, (3) single-pass investigation insufficient, (4) factual accuracy is critical. Provides the loop logic: iterate until verification thresholds met. Does NOT trigger for: opinions, preferences, how-to instructions, or when user explicitly wants quick answer.
deep-investigation-protocol
"What is REALLY at stake here? And for whom?" - STOP. When the matter involves trustworthiness, purchasing decisions, "which is better or more reliable", brand comparisons, marketing claims, corporate behavior, "convince me otherwise", or post-purchase "was this good?" - USE THIS. For technical specs affecting quality (TLC vs QLC, component sourcing) use Light Touch mode. Search and verify even if you think you know. Does NOT trigger for: what to watch/eat/wear, how-to instructions, when/where/who founded, or explicit "just tell me quick."
prediction-tracking
Track and evaluate AI predictions over time to assess accuracy. Use when reviewing past predictions to determine if they came true, failed, or remain uncertain.
cns-tinker
Apply Chiral Narrative Synthesis (CNS) framework for contradiction detection and multi-source analysis using Tinker API for model training. Use when implementing CNS with Tinker for fine-tuning models on contradiction detection, training on SciFact/FEVER datasets, or building multi-agent debate systems for narrative synthesis.
research-and-fact-checker
Performs accurate research and fact-checking using reliable sources. Ideal for validating claims, clarifying complex topics, summarizing findings, and ensuring information accuracy.
shatter-and-recalibrate
Shatter compromised calibration and rebuild from ground truth.