adversarial-training
Defensive techniques using adversarial examples to improve model robustness and security
When & Why to Use This Skill
This Claude skill provides comprehensive defensive techniques to enhance AI model robustness through adversarial training. By simulating sophisticated attacks like PGD, FGSM, and AutoAttack during the training phase, it enables developers to build resilient models that resist data poisoning, jailbreaks, and misinformation, ensuring alignment with OWASP LLM 2025 and NIST AI RMF security standards.
Use Cases
- Hardening Large Language Models (LLMs) against prompt injections and jailbreak attempts by incorporating adversarial prompts into the fine-tuning process.
- Improving the reliability of computer vision systems by training models to recognize and ignore pixel-level perturbations and patch attacks.
- Implementing 'Certified Defense' mechanisms to provide provable robustness guarantees for mission-critical AI applications in regulated industries.
- Optimizing the tradeoff between clean accuracy and adversarial robustness using the TRADES (Tradeoff Defense) method for production-ready AI.
- Automating security evaluations within CI/CD pipelines to measure 'Adversarial Accuracy' before deploying new model versions.
| name | adversarial-training |
|---|---|
| version | "2.0.0" |
| description | Defensive techniques using adversarial examples to improve model robustness and security |
| sasmp_version | "1.3.0" |
| bonded_agent | 05-defense-strategy-developer |
| bond_type | PRIMARY_BOND |
| type | number |
| required | [training_method] |
| enum | [fgsm, pgd, cw, autoattack] |
| default | 0.3 |
| owasp_llm_2025 | [LLM04, LLM09] |
| nist_ai_rmf | [Manage] |
Adversarial Training
Build robust AI models by training with adversarial examples and attack simulations.
Quick Reference
Skill: adversarial-training
Agent: 05-defense-strategy-developer
OWASP: LLM04 (Data Poisoning), LLM09 (Misinformation)
NIST: Manage function
Use Case: Improve model robustness against attacks
Training Methods
1. Standard Adversarial Training
Method: standard
Robustness Gain: 30-50%
Accuracy Tradeoff: 5-15%
Complexity: Medium
class AdversarialTrainer:
def __init__(self, model, epsilon=0.3, attack_steps=10):
self.model = model
self.epsilon = epsilon
self.attack_steps = attack_steps
def train_step(self, x, y):
# Generate adversarial examples using PGD
x_adv = self.pgd_attack(x, y)
# Train on both clean and adversarial
loss_clean = self.criterion(self.model(x), y)
loss_adv = self.criterion(self.model(x_adv), y)
# Weighted combination
total_loss = 0.5 * loss_clean + 0.5 * loss_adv
return total_loss
def pgd_attack(self, x, y):
"""Projected Gradient Descent attack"""
x_adv = x.clone().requires_grad_(True)
for _ in range(self.attack_steps):
loss = self.criterion(self.model(x_adv), y)
loss.backward()
# Step in gradient direction
x_adv = x_adv + self.epsilon/self.attack_steps * x_adv.grad.sign()
# Project to epsilon ball
x_adv = torch.clamp(x_adv, x-self.epsilon, x+self.epsilon)
x_adv = x_adv.detach().requires_grad_(True)
return x_adv
2. TRADES (Tradeoff Defense)
Method: trades
Robustness Gain: 40-60%
Accuracy Tradeoff: 3-8%
Complexity: Medium
class TRADESTrainer:
def __init__(self, model, beta=6.0):
self.model = model
self.beta = beta # Tradeoff parameter
def train_step(self, x, y):
# Natural loss
logits_natural = self.model(x)
loss_natural = F.cross_entropy(logits_natural, y)
# Generate adversarial examples
x_adv = self.generate_adversarial(x, logits_natural)
# Robust loss (KL divergence)
logits_adv = self.model(x_adv)
loss_robust = F.kl_div(
F.log_softmax(logits_adv, dim=1),
F.softmax(logits_natural, dim=1),
reduction='batchmean'
)
# Combined loss
return loss_natural + self.beta * loss_robust
3. Certified Defense
Method: certified
Robustness Guarantee: Provable
Accuracy Tradeoff: 10-20%
Complexity: High
class CertifiedDefense:
"""Randomized Smoothing for certified robustness"""
def __init__(self, base_model, sigma=0.5, n_samples=1000):
self.model = base_model
self.sigma = sigma
self.n_samples = n_samples
def certify(self, x):
"""Get certified radius for prediction"""
# Sample multiple noisy versions
counts = []
for _ in range(self.n_samples):
noise = torch.randn_like(x) * self.sigma
pred = self.model(x + noise).argmax()
counts.append(pred)
# Get most common prediction
top_class = mode(counts)
p_a = counts.count(top_class) / len(counts)
# Certified radius
if p_a > 0.5:
radius = self.sigma * norm.ppf(p_a)
return top_class, radius
return None, 0
Attack Types to Train Against
┌────────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────┬───────────────┐
│ Attack │ Method │ Priority │ Training Time │
├────────────────┼─────────────────┼──────────────┼───────────────┤
│ FGSM │ Single-step │ Medium │ Fast │
│ PGD │ Multi-step │ High │ Medium │
│ C&W │ Optimization │ High │ Slow │
│ AutoAttack │ Ensemble │ Critical │ Very Slow │
│ Patch Attack │ Physical │ Medium │ Medium │
│ Semantic │ Perturbation │ High │ Medium │
└────────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────┴───────────────┘
Training Pipeline
Phase 1: BASELINE EVALUATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Tasks:
□ Evaluate clean accuracy
□ Measure initial robustness
□ Identify weak attack vectors
Phase 2: ADVERSARIAL DATA GENERATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Tasks:
□ Generate diverse adversarial examples
□ Include multiple attack types
□ Balance attack strengths
Phase 3: TRAINING
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Tasks:
□ Mix clean and adversarial data
□ Monitor accuracy tradeoff
□ Early stopping on validation
Phase 4: EVALUATION
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Tasks:
□ Test against held-out attacks
□ Measure robustness improvement
□ Validate no excessive accuracy loss
LLM-Specific Training
class LLMAdversarialTraining:
"""Adversarial training for language models"""
def generate_adversarial_prompts(self, clean_prompts):
adversarial = []
for prompt in clean_prompts:
# Synonym substitution
adversarial.append(self.synonym_attack(prompt))
# Character-level perturbation
adversarial.append(self.char_attack(prompt))
# Jailbreak attempts
adversarial.append(self.jailbreak_prefix(prompt))
return adversarial
def train_step(self, prompts, expected_responses):
# Include adversarial prompts in training
adv_prompts = self.generate_adversarial_prompts(prompts)
all_prompts = prompts + adv_prompts
all_responses = expected_responses + expected_responses
loss = self.compute_loss(all_prompts, all_responses)
return loss
Effectiveness Metrics
Metrics:
robustness_accuracy:
description: Accuracy on adversarial examples
target: ">70%"
clean_accuracy:
description: Accuracy on clean examples
target: ">95% of baseline"
certified_radius:
description: Provable robustness bound
target: ">0.5 (L2 norm)"
attack_coverage:
description: Attacks defended against
target: "All major attack types"
Troubleshooting
Issue: Excessive accuracy drop
Solution: Reduce adversarial ratio, tune beta parameter
Issue: Training unstable
Solution: Use curriculum learning, start with weak attacks
Issue: Not robust to new attacks
Solution: Include more diverse attack types in training
Integration Points
| Component | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Agent 05 | Implements training |
| adversarial-examples skill | Generates attacks |
| /defend | Applies training recommendations |
| CI/CD | Automated robustness testing |
Build robust AI models through adversarial training techniques.