deep-research
Expert deep research including multi-source verification, fact-checking, and comprehensive analysis
When & Why to Use This Skill
This Claude skill provides expert-level deep research capabilities, enabling users to perform multi-source verification, rigorous fact-checking, and comprehensive analysis. It automates the process of gathering information from diverse sources—including official documentation, academic papers, and industry reports—while ensuring data accuracy through cross-referencing and credibility assessments. By following a systematic methodology, it delivers structured reports with citations, confidence ratings, and actionable insights, making it an essential tool for high-stakes information gathering.
Use Cases
- Market Analysis: Investigating industry trends and competitor strategies using multiple independent reports to ensure data-driven decision-making.
- Fact-Checking: Verifying the accuracy of complex claims, news, or public statements by cross-referencing official documents and primary sources.
- Technical Investigation: Researching emerging technologies or software frameworks to understand adoption rates, performance benchmarks, and official documentation.
- Professional Synthesis: Compiling comprehensive research reports with full source attribution and confidence levels for executive or academic review.
| name | deep-research |
|---|---|
| description | Expert deep research including multi-source verification, fact-checking, and comprehensive analysis |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| author | USER |
| tags | [research, deep-research, fact-checking, multi-source, analysis] |
Deep Research
Purpose
Conduct comprehensive research using multiple sources, cross-verification, and systematic analysis to provide accurate, well-sourced information.
Activation Keywords
- deep research, comprehensive research
- fact check, verify, validate
- multi-source, cross-reference
- investigate, analyze thoroughly
- research report, findings
Core Capabilities
1. Multi-Source Research
- Web search aggregation
- Academic sources
- Official documentation
- Expert opinions
- Primary sources
2. Verification
- Cross-reference facts
- Source credibility assessment
- Bias detection
- Recency validation
- Citation tracking
3. Analysis
- Pattern identification
- Trend analysis
- Gap detection
- Contradiction resolution
- Synthesis
4. Documentation
- Structured findings
- Source attribution
- Confidence levels
- Limitations noted
- Actionable insights
5. Quality Assurance
- Fact accuracy check
- Source diversity
- Completeness assessment
- Objectivity review
Research Methodology
1. Define Scope
→ Clear research questions
→ Success criteria
→ Time/depth constraints
2. Gather Sources
→ Primary sources (official docs, APIs)
→ Secondary sources (articles, reports)
→ Tertiary sources (summaries, reviews)
→ Minimum 5+ independent sources
3. Verify & Cross-Reference
→ Fact triangulation
→ Date verification
→ Author credibility
→ Source independence
4. Analyze & Synthesize
→ Pattern extraction
→ Contradiction resolution
→ Gap identification
→ Insight generation
5. Document Findings
→ Executive summary
→ Detailed findings
→ Source citations
→ Confidence ratings
→ Limitations
Source Credibility Matrix
| Source Type | Credibility | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Official docs | High | Technical facts |
| Peer-reviewed | High | Scientific claims |
| Industry reports | Medium-High | Market data |
| News outlets | Medium | Current events |
| Blogs/Forums | Low-Medium | Community sentiment |
| Social media | Low | Trend indicators |
Research Report Template
# Research Report: [Topic]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview]
## Key Findings
1. [Finding with source]
2. [Finding with source]
3. [Finding with source]
## Detailed Analysis
### [Subtopic 1]
[Analysis with citations]
### [Subtopic 2]
[Analysis with citations]
## Sources
- [Source 1] - [Credibility: High/Medium/Low]
- [Source 2] - [Credibility: High/Medium/Low]
## Confidence Assessment
- Overall: [High/Medium/Low]
- Areas of uncertainty: [List]
## Limitations
- [Limitation 1]
- [Limitation 2]
## Recommendations
1. [Actionable recommendation]
2. [Actionable recommendation]
Example Usage
User: "Research the current state of WebAssembly adoption"
Deep Research Response:
1. Define scope
- Adoption metrics
- Use cases
- Browser support
- Performance benchmarks
2. Sources gathered (7)
- WebAssembly.org (official)
- MDN Web Docs
- State of JS 2024 survey
- GitHub usage statistics
- Browser release notes
- Industry case studies
- Performance benchmarks
3. Key findings
- 95%+ browser support
- Growing in serverless
- Primary use: performance-critical
- Major adopters: Figma, Google Earth
4. Confidence: High
- Multiple corroborating sources
- Recent data (2024)
- Official documentation verified