extract-requirements

majiayu000's avatarfrom majiayu000

Use this when user needs to document business requirements from undocumented legacy code. Provides systematic 6-phase extraction: automated analysis, validation rules, use cases, business rules, data models, and workflow mapping. Apply for legacy system documentation, migration planning, compliance audits, or M&A due diligence

⭐0stars🔀0forks📁View on GitHub🕐Updated Jan 5, 2026

When & Why to Use This Skill

The 'extract-requirements' Claude skill is a specialized workflow designed to reverse-engineer and document business requirements from undocumented legacy codebases. By employing a systematic 6-phase extraction process—covering automated analysis, validation rules, use cases, and workflow mapping—it transforms complex source code into structured documentation, making it an essential tool for system migration, compliance auditing, and technical debt management.

Use Cases

  • Legacy System Migration: Extracting a comprehensive requirements baseline to ensure feature parity and logic accuracy when transitioning to modern tech stacks.
  • Compliance and Regulatory Audits: Automatically generating documentation of business rules, authorization checks, and data constraints to satisfy legal or industry standards.
  • M&A Technical Due Diligence: Rapidly assessing and mapping the functional capabilities and embedded business logic of acquired software assets.
  • Knowledge Transfer and Preservation: Recovering critical business logic and system behavior documentation when original developers or stakeholders are no longer available.
  • Reverse Engineering for Refactoring: Identifying core business rules and state transitions within 'spaghetti code' to guide architectural improvements.
name"extract-requirements"
description"Use this when user needs to document business requirements from undocumented legacy code. Provides systematic 6-phase extraction: automated analysis, validation rules, use cases, business rules, data models, and workflow mapping. Apply for legacy system documentation, migration planning, compliance audits, or M&A due diligence"
categories["workflow", "requirements", "documentation"]
tags["requirements", "business-rules", "documentation", "reverse-engineering"]
version"1.0.0"

Extract Requirements Workflow

Purpose

Systematic process for extracting business requirements from undocumented or poorly documented codebases.

When to Use

  • ✅ Legacy system with no documentation
  • ✅ Planning migration (need requirements baseline)
  • ✅ M&A due diligence (understand acquired system)
  • ✅ Compliance audit (document what system does)
  • ✅ Knowledge transfer (developers leaving)

Prerequisites

Codebase Indexed

codecompass batch:index <path>

Infrastructure Running

codecompass health

Extraction Workflow

Phase 1: Automated Extraction

Step 1.1: Run Requirements Extractor

codecompass requirements:extract --project-id <id> --output requirements.md

What this extracts:

  1. Validation Rules → Business constraints
  2. Controller Actions → Use cases
  3. Database Constraints → Data integrity rules
  4. RBAC/Authorization → Access requirements
  5. Business Logic → Domain rules

Step 1.2: Review Output Check generated requirements.md:

  • Completeness (coverage of major features)
  • Accuracy (rules match actual behavior)
  • Gaps (missing business logic)

Phase 2: Validation Rule Analysis

From Models/Entities:

// Yii2 Model example
public function rules() {
  return [
    [['email', 'password'], 'required'],
    ['email', 'email'],
    ['password', 'string', 'min' => 8],
    ['age', 'integer', 'min' => 18],
  ];
}

Extracted Requirements:

### User Registration Requirements
- REQ-001: Email address is mandatory
- REQ-002: Email must be valid format
- REQ-003: Password is mandatory
- REQ-004: Password minimum length: 8 characters
- REQ-005: User must be at least 18 years old

Phase 3: Use Case Extraction

From Controllers:

// Controller actions → Use cases
public function actionCreate() {
  // Use Case: Create New Order
}

public function actionApprove($id) {
  // Use Case: Approve Order (with authorization check)
}

public function actionCancel($id) {
  // Use Case: Cancel Order (business rules apply)
}

Extracted Use Cases:

## Order Management Use Cases

### UC-001: Create New Order
**Actor**: Customer
**Preconditions**: User authenticated
**Steps**:
1. User selects products
2. System validates inventory
3. User provides shipping address
4. System calculates total
5. Order created in pending status

### UC-002: Approve Order
**Actor**: Manager
**Preconditions**:
- Order in pending status
- User has 'manager' role
**Steps**:
1. Manager reviews order details
2. System validates business rules
3. Order status changed to approved
4. Notification sent to customer

Phase 4: Business Rule Discovery

Semantic Search for Rules:

codecompass search:semantic "business validation rules for order approval"
codecompass search:semantic "conditions for discount calculation"
codecompass search:semantic "authorization checks for admin actions"

Common Patterns to Find:

  1. Conditional Logic → Business rules
  2. Status Transitions → Workflow states
  3. Calculations → Business formulas
  4. Validations → Constraints
  5. Authorization Checks → Access rules

Phase 5: Data Model Requirements

From Database Schema:

CREATE TABLE orders (
  id INT PRIMARY KEY,
  status ENUM('pending', 'approved', 'shipped', 'cancelled'),
  total DECIMAL(10,2) NOT NULL CHECK (total >= 0),
  customer_id INT NOT NULL FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES customers(id),
  created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);

Extracted Requirements:

### Data Requirements
- REQ-010: Order must have unique identifier
- REQ-011: Order status: pending, approved, shipped, or cancelled
- REQ-012: Order total must be non-negative
- REQ-013: Order must be associated with a customer
- REQ-014: Order creation timestamp must be recorded

Phase 6: Workflow Mapping

Identify State Machines:

Order Status Flow:
pending → approved → shipped → delivered
         ↓
         cancelled

Extract Transitions:

### Order Workflow
**States**: pending, approved, shipped, cancelled, delivered

**Transitions**:
- pending → approved (requires: manager approval)
- approved → shipped (requires: items in stock)
- shipped → delivered (requires: delivery confirmation)
- pending|approved → cancelled (requires: cancellation reason)

**Business Rules**:
- Cannot cancel after shipped
- Cannot approve if out of stock
- Refund required if cancelled after payment

Extraction Techniques

Technique 1: Code Reading Patterns

Look for:

  • if statements → Business conditions
  • switch/case → State transitions
  • Loops → Bulk operations
  • Exceptions → Error handling requirements
  • Comments → Intent (when present)

Technique 2: Test Analysis

Tests reveal:

  • Expected behavior (what should happen)
  • Edge cases (what shouldn't happen)
  • Valid input ranges
  • Error scenarios
codecompass search:semantic "test cases for order validation"

Technique 3: Configuration Analysis

Config files contain:

  • Feature flags → Optional requirements
  • Limits/thresholds → Business constraints
  • Integration settings → External dependencies

Technique 4: Semantic Clustering

Find related code:

# Find all code related to "discount calculation"
codecompass search:semantic "discount calculation logic"

# Find all code related to "inventory management"
codecompass search:semantic "inventory stock management"

Group results by business capability

Output Formats

Format 1: Requirements Document (Markdown)

# Business Requirements - [System Name]

## Functional Requirements

### FR-001: User Authentication
**Priority**: High
**Description**: System must authenticate users via email and password
**Acceptance Criteria**:
- Email validation follows RFC 5322
- Password minimum 8 characters
- Account locked after 5 failed attempts
**Source**: UserController::actionLogin(), User::validatePassword()

### FR-002: Order Approval Workflow
...

Format 2: Capability Map (Structured)

{
  "capabilities": {
    "user_management": {
      "features": ["register", "login", "reset_password"],
      "rules": ["email_unique", "password_complexity"],
      "roles": ["user", "admin"]
    },
    "order_processing": {
      "features": ["create", "approve", "cancel", "ship"],
      "rules": ["approval_required", "inventory_check"],
      "workflow": "pending→approved→shipped→delivered"
    }
  }
}

Format 3: Use Case Catalog

| UC ID | Use Case Name | Actor | Complexity |
|-------|---------------|-------|------------|
| UC-001 | Create Order | Customer | Medium |
| UC-002 | Approve Order | Manager | Low |
| UC-003 | Cancel Order | Customer/Manager | High |

Validation Steps

Step 1: Cross-Check with Tests

Compare extracted requirements with test cases:

  • Tests validate requirements
  • Missing tests → Undocumented behavior
  • Failing tests → Requirements changed

Step 2: Semantic Verification

# For each requirement, verify in code
codecompass search:semantic "password must be at least 8 characters"

Should find validator implementation

Step 3: Interview Stakeholders (if available)

  • Validate extracted requirements
  • Fill gaps in documentation
  • Clarify ambiguous logic

Step 4: Traceability Matrix

Map requirements to code:

| Requirement | Source Files | Tests |
|-------------|--------------|-------|
| REQ-001 | User.php:45, UserController.php:102 | UserTest.php:23 |
| REQ-002 | Order.php:78 | OrderTest.php:56 |

Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Implicit Requirements

Code:

if ($order->total < 1000) {
  // No approval needed
}

Requirement:

REQ: Orders under $1000 do not require manager approval

Pattern 2: Embedded Business Logic

Code:

$discount = ($customer->vip) ? 0.20 : 0.10;

Requirement:

REQ: VIP customers receive 20% discount, regular customers 10%

Pattern 3: Temporal Constraints

Code:

if (strtotime($order->created_at) > strtotime('-30 days')) {
  // Can cancel
}

Requirement:

REQ: Orders can only be cancelled within 30 days of creation

Best Practices

✅ Do

  • Extract from multiple sources (code, tests, configs)
  • Use semantic search for concept discovery
  • Validate with tests
  • Document sources for traceability
  • Prioritize by business impact
  • Include non-functional requirements (performance, security)

❌ Don't

  • Rely solely on comments (often outdated)
  • Assume standard behavior without verification
  • Skip edge cases
  • Ignore error handling logic
  • Document technical implementation instead of business requirements
  • 0-discover-capabilities.md - Find relevant modules
  • semantic-search.md - Search for business logic
  • analyze-yii2-project.md - Framework-specific extraction

From .ai/capabilities.json:

  • requirements - RequirementsExtractionService
  • business-analyzer - CapabilityCatalogService
  • search - Semantic code search
  • analyzers - Code analysis for extraction

Remember: Requirements are what the system must do, not how it does it. Focus on business value, not technical implementation.