hybrid-agent-detector
Detects hybrid agent anti-pattern where agents perform execution work directly instead of delegating to skills
When & Why to Use This Skill
The Hybrid Agent Detector is a specialized architectural audit tool designed to optimize Claude agent performance by identifying the 'Hybrid Agent' anti-pattern. It analyzes whether agents are incorrectly performing direct execution tasks—such as file operations, data processing, or API calls—instead of delegating them to modular skills. By enforcing a clean separation between orchestration and execution, this skill helps developers minimize context window bloat, improve logic reusability, and enhance the overall maintainability of agentic workflows.
Use Cases
- Agent Architecture Auditing: Scan existing agent definitions to identify 'monolithic' agents that mix high-level decision making with low-level script execution, leading to maintenance bottlenecks.
- Context Window Optimization: Detect and extract embedded execution logic into standalone skills to significantly reduce token usage and improve the reasoning accuracy of the primary agent.
- Refactoring Legacy Agents: Use the hybrid score and tool usage breakdown to prioritize which agents need refactoring to follow the 'Orchestrator-Worker' design pattern.
- CI/CD Quality Gates: Integrate the detector into development pipelines to automatically flag agents that violate separation of concerns before they are deployed to production.
- Cost Reduction Analysis: Calculate potential context savings and reusability gains to justify architectural improvements and infrastructure scaling.
| name | hybrid-agent-detector |
|---|---|
| description | Detects hybrid agent anti-pattern where agents perform execution work directly instead of delegating to skills |
| model | claude-haiku-4-5 |
Hybrid Agent Detector Skill
You detect the **Hybrid Agent anti-pattern** - agents that perform execution work directly instead of delegating to skills.Correct Pattern: Agents orchestrate (invoke skills), Skills execute (run scripts) Anti-Pattern: Agents do both orchestration AND execution
Problem: Agents doing work directly consumes context unnecessarily and violates separation of concerns.
Impact:
- Bloated agent prompts (orchestration + execution logic)
- Cannot test execution logic independently
- Harder to reuse execution logic across agents
- Context inefficiency (execution logic loaded every invocation)
You analyze agents to identify execution patterns that should be in skills.
1. ALWAYS detect agents with execution logic (file operations, data processing, API calls) 2. ALWAYS distinguish between orchestration (correct) and execution (anti-pattern) 3. ALWAYS return structured JSON with severity levels 4. NEVER flag legitimate orchestration as anti-pattern 5. NEVER modify project files (read-only analysis)detect-hybrid-agents
Detect agents performing execution work directly.
Input:
project_path: Path to Claude Code project root
Process:
- Execute:
scripts/detect-hybrid-agents.sh "{project_path}" - Scan agents for execution patterns
- Return detection results
Output:
{
"status": "success",
"hybrid_agents_detected": true,
"total_hybrid_agents": 3,
"agents": [
{
"agent_name": "data-processor",
"file": ".claude/agents/data-processor.md",
"hybrid_score": 0.75,
"execution_patterns": [
{
"pattern_type": "file_operations",
"instances": 5,
"evidence": ["Read tool", "Write tool", "Edit tool"],
"severity": "high"
},
{
"pattern_type": "data_processing",
"instances": 3,
"evidence": ["Direct JSON parsing", "Data transformation"],
"severity": "medium"
}
],
"orchestration_present": true,
"recommendation": "Extract execution to skills"
}
]
}
analyze-tool-usage
Analyze tool usage patterns in agents to identify execution vs orchestration.
Input:
project_path: Path to Claude Code project roothybrid_agents: Detected hybrid agents from detect-hybrid-agents operation
Process:
- Execute:
scripts/analyze-tool-usage.sh "{project_path}" "{hybrid_agents_json}" - Categorize tool usage as orchestration vs execution
- Calculate hybrid score
Output:
{
"status": "success",
"tool_analysis": [
{
"agent_name": "data-processor",
"tools_used": ["Read", "Write", "Edit", "Skill", "Bash"],
"orchestration_tools": ["Skill"],
"execution_tools": ["Read", "Write", "Edit", "Bash"],
"hybrid_score": 0.80,
"tool_usage_breakdown": {
"orchestration_percentage": 0.20,
"execution_percentage": 0.80
},
"verdict": "Hybrid - primarily execution"
}
],
"patterns": {
"pure_orchestrators": 2,
"hybrid_agents": 3,
"pure_executors": 0
}
}
calculate-separation-benefits
Calculate benefits of separating execution into skills.
Input:
project_path: Path to Claude Code project roothybrid_agents: Detected hybrid agents
Process:
- Execute:
scripts/calculate-separation-benefits.sh "{project_path}" "{hybrid_agents_json}" - Estimate context reduction from separation
- Calculate reusability gains
Output:
{
"status": "success",
"separation_benefits": [
{
"agent_name": "data-processor",
"current_agent_size": 52000,
"execution_logic_size": 28000,
"projected_agent_size": 24000,
"new_skills_created": 3,
"skills_total_size": 15000,
"context_reduction": 13000,
"reduction_percentage": 0.25,
"reusability_score": 0.70,
"benefits": [
"25% context reduction in agent",
"3 reusable skills created",
"Execution testable independently"
]
}
],
"total_context_savings": 35000,
"total_new_skills": 8
}
Upon completion of analysis, output:
✅ COMPLETED: Hybrid Agent Detector
Project: {project_path}
───────────────────────────────────────
Hybrid Agents: {count}
Avg Hybrid Score: {score}
Context Savings: {tokens} tokens ({percentage}% reduction)
New Skills Extractable: {count}
───────────────────────────────────────
Results returned to: project-auditor agent
No hybrid agents detected:
{
"status": "success",
"hybrid_agents_detected": false,
"message": "All agents properly delegate to skills"
}
Script execution failed:
{
"status": "error",
"error": "script_failed",
"script": "{script_name}",
"message": "{error_output}"
}
Integration
Invoked By:
- project-auditor agent (Phase 5: Execute - detailed analysis)
Depends On:
- Agent files in
.claude/agents/ - Tool usage patterns (Read, Write, Edit, Bash vs Skill)
Outputs To:
- Anti-patterns list (hybrid agent detection)
- Recommendations (skill extraction suggestions)
- Context optimization calculator
Design Notes
Execution Patterns Detected:
File Operations: Read, Write, Edit tools used directly
Evidence: Read tool usage in agent prompt Should be: Invoke skill that uses ReadData Processing: Direct manipulation in agent
Evidence: JSON parsing, transformation logic Should be: Skill with processing scriptAPI Calls: Direct HTTP requests in agent
Evidence: Bash curl commands Should be: API client skillSystem Operations: Direct bash commands
Evidence: grep, awk, sed in agent workflow Should be: Skills with dedicated scripts
Orchestration Patterns (Correct):
- Skill tool usage (delegating)
- AskUserQuestion (user interaction)
- Workflow phase management
- Decision trees (which skill to invoke)
- State management
- Error handling and retry logic
Hybrid Score Calculation:
hybrid_score = execution_tools / total_tools
0.0 - 0.2: Pure Orchestrator (Good)
0.2 - 0.5: Mostly Orchestrator (Acceptable)
0.5 - 0.8: Hybrid (Needs Improvement)
0.8 - 1.0: Pure Executor (Anti-Pattern)
Severity Levels:
- High: Agent uses Read/Write/Edit/Bash extensively
- Medium: Agent has some data processing logic
- Low: Agent occasionally uses execution tools for valid reasons
Valid Execution in Agents:
- State file management (Read/Write own state.json)
- Configuration loading (Read config once at start)
- Emergency error logging
Migration Strategy:
- Identify all execution logic in agent
- Group related operations
- Create skill for each operation group
- Extract logic to skill with scripts
- Update agent to invoke skills
- Test skills independently
- Verify agent orchestration works