orphan-analysis
Identify orphan earthquakes far from mapped faults that indicate unmapped active structures. Use when analyzing microseismicity, finding dark earthquake source faults, or validating fault database gaps. Triggers on "orphan analysis", "unmapped fault", "microseismicity", "fault gap".
When & Why to Use This Skill
The orphan-analysis skill is a specialized tool for seismologists and geologists to detect unmapped active fault structures by identifying 'orphan earthquakes'—seismic events located significantly far from known fault lines. By integrating earthquake catalogs with regional fault databases, it automates the detection of microseismicity patterns and validates gaps in existing geological records to improve seismic hazard assessments.
Use Cases
- Detecting unmapped active structures: Identify hidden fault lines by analyzing clusters of seismic events that fall outside of established fault databases like DISS or SCEC CFM.
- Validating fault database completeness: Quantify 'orphan rates' in specific regions to assess the reliability and coverage of existing seismic records and identify critical data gaps.
- Historical earthquake research: Correlate modern microseismicity with historical 'dark earthquakes' found in speleothem records to pinpoint ancient seismic sources.
- Geological field planning: Use azimuth-based clustering of orphan events to prioritize specific geographic areas for Digital Elevation Model (DEM) analysis and field mapping.
| name | orphan-analysis |
|---|---|
| description | Identify orphan earthquakes far from mapped faults that indicate unmapped active structures. Use when analyzing microseismicity, finding dark earthquake source faults, or validating fault database gaps. Triggers on "orphan analysis", "unmapped fault", "microseismicity", "fault gap". |
/orphan-analysis - Orphan Earthquake Detection Skill
Purpose
Identify "orphan earthquakes" - seismic events far from any mapped fault - that indicate unmapped active structures. These structures may be sources of historical "dark earthquakes" detectable in speleothem records.
Usage
/orphan-analysis <lat> <lon> [--name NAME] [--radius KM] [--orphan-threshold KM]
Examples:
/orphan-analysis 44.13 8.11 --name "Bàsura Cave"
/orphan-analysis 41.42 31.93 --name "Sofular Cave" --radius 150
/orphan-analysis 16.2 -89.1 --name "Yok Balum" --orphan-threshold 30
Methodology
Validated in Italy
The orphan analysis methodology was validated in the Ligurian Alps:
- 80% orphan rate revealed unmapped NNW-trending fault
- 193+ earthquakes on structure not in ANY database
- 25+ km lineament identified via DEM + microseismicity
- Now primary candidate for 1285/1394 dark earthquakes
Workflow
Step 1: Search Earthquake Catalog
Use earthquake_search MCP tool:
earthquake_search lat=44.13 lon=8.11 radius_km=100 min_magnitude=2.0
Parameters:
- Default radius: 100 km
- Default min_magnitude: 2.0 (for microseismicity)
- Date range: 1900-present (or available)
Step 2: Load Fault Database
Query regional fault database:
| Region | Primary Database | File/URL |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | DISS v3.3.1 | data/fault_databases/diss331_*.geojson |
| California | SCEC CFM v7.0 | data/fault_databases/scec_cfm_*.geojson |
| Turkey | AFAD | Web query |
| Global | GEM Global | data/gem_active_faults.geojson |
Step 3: Calculate Distances
For each earthquake, calculate distance to nearest mapped fault:
For each earthquake:
min_distance = infinity
for each fault_segment:
d = calc_distance(eq.lat, eq.lon, fault.lat, fault.lon)
if d < min_distance:
min_distance = d
nearest_fault = fault.name
earthquake.dist_to_fault = min_distance
earthquake.nearest_fault = nearest_fault
Step 4: Classify Orphans
Apply orphan threshold (default: 50 km):
if dist_to_fault > orphan_threshold:
earthquake.is_orphan = True
else:
earthquake.is_orphan = False
Step 5: Cluster Orphans by Azimuth
Group orphan earthquakes by direction from reference point:
Azimuth bins:
- N (337.5-22.5°)
- NE (22.5-67.5°)
- E (67.5-112.5°)
- SE (112.5-157.5°)
- S (157.5-202.5°)
- SW (202.5-247.5°)
- W (247.5-292.5°)
- NW (292.5-337.5°)
Step 6: Generate Report
## Orphan Earthquake Analysis: [Location Name]
**Reference point**: [lat]°N, [lon]°E
**Search radius**: [X] km
**Orphan threshold**: [X] km
**Analysis date**: [date]
---
### Summary Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Total earthquakes | [N] |
| Orphan earthquakes | [N] ([X]%) |
| M4+ orphans | [N] |
| M5+ orphans | [N] |
---
### Orphan Rate Assessment
| Rate | Interpretation |
|------|----------------|
| > 50% | **CRITICAL** - Major unmapped structure likely |
| 30-50% | **HIGH** - Significant database gap |
| 10-30% | **MODERATE** - Some unmapped faults |
| < 10% | **LOW** - Database reasonably complete |
**This region**: [X]% → [INTERPRETATION]
---
### Orphan Clusters by Azimuth
| Direction | Count | Avg Distance | M4+ | M5+ | Structure? |
|-----------|-------|--------------|-----|-----|------------|
| NNW | [N] | [X] km | [N] | [N] | [YES/NO] |
| SW | [N] | [X] km | [N] | [N] | [YES/NO] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
---
### Candidate Unmapped Structures
#### Structure 1: [Direction] Lineament
- **Azimuth**: [X]° ([direction])
- **Orphan count**: [N] earthquakes
- **Distance range**: [min]-[max] km from reference
- **Magnitude range**: M[min]-M[max]
- **Largest event**: M[X] on [date]
**Interpretation**: [Description of possible fault]
---
### Mapped Faults in Region
| Fault Name | Strike | Distance | Type |
|------------|--------|----------|------|
| [name] | [X]° | [X] km | [normal/strike-slip/etc.] |
---
### Visualization
[Description of recommended figure showing:]
- Reference point (cave location)
- Mapped faults (from database)
- All earthquakes (color by orphan status)
- Azimuth bins with orphan clusters
Output Files
The skill can generate:
- Analysis report (
[REGION]_ORPHAN_ANALYSIS.md) - Earthquake CSV (
[region]_earthquakes.csv) - Orphan subset CSV (
[region]_orphans.csv) - Cluster definitions (
[region]_clusters.json)
MCP Tools Used
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
earthquake_search |
Search USGS catalog |
calc_distance |
Calculate earthquake-fault distances |
calc_pga |
Estimate ground motion (optional) |
Example: Italy Bàsura Results
## Orphan Analysis: Bàsura Cave (Italy)
Reference: 44.1275°N, 8.1108°E
Radius: 100 km
Orphan threshold: 50 km
### Summary
- Total earthquakes: 241
- Orphan earthquakes: 193 (80%)
- M4+ orphans: 12
- M5+ orphans: 2
### Orphan Rate: 80% → CRITICAL
### Key Finding: NNW Lineament
- Azimuth: 340° (NNW-SSE)
- 85 orphan earthquakes
- Not in DISS, ITHACA, or EFSM20
- 25+ km linear structure identified
- Primary candidate for 1285/1394 dark earthquakes
Integration with DEM Analysis
After orphan analysis, recommend DEM lineament check:
If orphan_rate > 30%:
Recommend: /dem-pipeline for visual confirmation
Look for:
- Linear drainage patterns aligned with orphan clusters
- Edge detection features at orphan azimuths
- Topographic breaks matching cluster directions
Regional Catalogs
| Region | Catalog | Coverage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Italy | INGV ISIDe | 1900-present | Excellent |
| California | USGS ANSS | 1900-present | Excellent |
| Turkey | AFAD | 1900-present | Good |
| Belize | USGS | Limited | Sparse coverage |
| Brazil | USGS + IAG | Limited | Intraplate, sparse |
Important Notes
- Orphan threshold varies by region - Use 50 km for plate boundaries, 30 km for intraplate
- Catalog completeness matters - Low magnitude threshold may include noise
- Fault database gaps exist - USGS has 9-27 year lag
- Offshore coverage poor - Many faults unmapped submarine
- Follow up with DEM - Visual confirmation strengthens case