paper-writing

DrSatsuma1's avatarfrom DrSatsuma1

Scientific manuscript preparation for geoscience journals. Includes IMRAD structure, journal styles (Nature, EPSL, GSA), citation formatting, figure standards, and supplementary materials.

0stars🔀0forks📁View on GitHub🕐Updated Jan 11, 2026

When & Why to Use This Skill

This Claude skill streamlines the preparation of scientific manuscripts for geoscience journals. It assists researchers in structuring papers according to the IMRAD format, ensuring compliance with specific journal styles like Nature Geoscience, EPSL, and GSA Bulletin, and automating complex citation and figure standards to improve publication success.

Use Cases

  • Drafting and refining manuscript sections (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) using domain-specific guidance for geoscience research.
  • Automating citation formatting and bibliography generation for various styles (Harvard, GSA, Nature) using DOI metadata and CrossRef integration.
  • Adapting a single manuscript to meet the specific word counts, abstract requirements, and formatting rules of different high-impact journals.
  • Ensuring figures and tables meet publication-ready standards, including resolution (DPI), colorblind-friendly palettes, and proper panel labeling.
  • Generating supplementary materials, data availability statements, and final submission checklists to ensure all journal requirements are met.
namepaper-writing
descriptionScientific manuscript preparation for geoscience journals. Includes IMRAD structure, journal styles (Nature, EPSL, GSA), citation formatting, figure standards, and supplementary materials.
locationuser

Paper Writing for Geoscience Research

When to Use This Skill

Invoke when:

  • Drafting manuscript sections
  • Formatting citations and bibliography
  • Preparing figures and tables
  • Adapting to journal-specific styles
  • Organizing supplementary materials

IMRAD Structure

Standard structure for geoscience papers:

Introduction

  • Hook: Why should anyone care? (1-2 paragraphs)
  • Context: What's known? What's the gap?
  • Objective: What question are we answering?
  • Approach: Brief methodology preview
  • Findings preview: "Here we show that..."

Methods

  • Study sites: Location, geology, relevance
  • Data collection: What, when, how
  • Analytical methods: Lab procedures, quality control
  • Statistical analysis: Tests used, software
  • Reproducibility: Data availability statement

Results

  • Present findings WITHOUT interpretation
  • Lead with most important result
  • One main finding per paragraph
  • Reference all figures/tables
  • Use past tense

Discussion

  • Interpretation: What do results mean?
  • Comparison: How do they fit prior work?
  • Implications: Why does this matter?
  • Limitations: What could be wrong?
  • Future work: What's next?

Conclusions

  • 3-5 key takeaways
  • No new information
  • Broader significance

Journal-Specific Styles

Nature Geoscience

  • Length: 3,000 words main text
  • Abstract: 150 words, no refs
  • Methods: Separate section (online)
  • Refs: Numbered, Nature style
  • Style: High impact, accessible to broad audience

EPSL (Earth and Planetary Science Letters)

  • Length: 6,000-8,000 words
  • Abstract: 300 words, structured OK
  • Keywords: 5-6 required
  • Refs: Author-year (Harvard style)
  • Style: Technical, detailed methods OK

GSA Bulletin

  • Length: 8,000-12,000 words
  • Abstract: 250 words
  • Refs: Author-year, GSA style
  • Supplementary: Encouraged for data
  • Style: Regional focus, detailed stratigraphy

Citation Formatting

Author-Year (Harvard/GSA)

In-text: (Smith and Jones, 2020) or Smith and Jones (2020)
Multiple: (Smith, 2018; Jones, 2019; Chen et al., 2020)
Three+ authors: (Chen et al., 2020)

Reference list:
Smith, J.A., and Jones, B.C., 2020, Title of paper: Journal Name, v. 50, p. 100-120, doi:10.1234/example.

Numbered (Nature)

In-text: Previous work¹⁻³ showed...

Reference list:
1. Smith, J.A. & Jones, B.C. Title of paper. J. Name 50, 100-120 (2020).

Database Citations

SISAL v3:

Comas-Bru, L., et al. (2020). SISALv2: A comprehensive speleothem isotope database with multiple age-depth models. Earth System Science Data, 12, 2579-2606.

USGS Earthquake Catalog:

U.S. Geological Survey (2023). Earthquake Hazards Program. https://earthquake.usgs.gov

DISS:

DISS Working Group (2021). Database of Individual Seismogenic Sources (DISS), Version 3.3.1: A compilation of potential sources for earthquakes larger than M 5.5 in Italy and surrounding areas. https://diss.ingv.it

DOI Resolution

To get citation metadata from DOI:

  1. Use CrossRef API: https://api.crossref.org/works/{DOI}
  2. Extract: authors, title, journal, year, volume, pages
  3. Format according to target journal style

Example:

DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2681
→ Toohey, M. & Sigl, M. Volcanic stratospheric sulfur injections and aerosol optical depth from 500 BCE to 1900 CE. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 809-831 (2017).

Figure Standards

General Guidelines

  • Resolution: 300+ DPI for publication
  • Width: Single column (8.5 cm) or double (17.5 cm)
  • Font: Sans-serif (Arial, Helvetica), 8-10 pt
  • Colors: Colorblind-friendly palette
  • Labels: A, B, C for panels (bold, upper left)

Required Figures for Paleoseismic Paper

  1. Location map: Study site with tectonic context
  2. Stratigraphic column: Sample positions, ages
  3. Time series: Main proxy data with anomalies marked
  4. Discrimination plot: Seismic vs climatic signals
  5. Correlation figure: Cross-validation evidence

Figure Captions

  • First sentence: What the figure SHOWS
  • Subsequent: Methods, abbreviations, interpretation hints
  • No conclusions in captions

Table Standards

  • Horizontal lines only (no vertical)
  • Units in header, not cells
  • Footnotes for exceptions (a, b, c)
  • Round to appropriate precision

Supplementary Materials

What to Include

  • Extended methods (lab protocols, code)
  • Additional figures (supporting evidence)
  • Data tables (raw measurements)
  • Sensitivity analyses

What to Keep in Main Text

  • Key results
  • Essential methods
  • Most compelling figures

Writing Tips

Clarity

  • One idea per sentence
  • Active voice preferred
  • Define acronyms on first use
  • Avoid jargon when possible

Hedging Language

  • "We suggest that..." (uncertainty)
  • "Our data are consistent with..." (not proof)
  • "One interpretation is..." (alternatives exist)

Transitions

  • "Building on this..."
  • "In contrast to X..."
  • "These findings suggest..."
  • "Taken together..."

Checklist Before Submission

  • Word count within limits
  • All figures/tables referenced in text
  • References formatted correctly
  • Data availability statement included
  • Author contributions listed
  • Conflicts of interest declared
  • Cover letter written
  • Suggested reviewers listed