research-intelligence

spitoglou's avatarfrom spitoglou

Extract insights, analyze claims, and synthesize knowledge from research content. Use when processing academic papers, articles, podcasts, videos, meeting transcripts, or any content where the goal is to extract wisdom, analyze arguments, summarize findings, or compile references. Triggers include "analyze this paper", "extract key insights", "summarize the research", "what are the main claims", "extract wisdom from", "compile references", "critique this argument".

0stars🔀0forks📁View on GitHub🕐Updated Jan 6, 2026

When & Why to Use This Skill

Research Intelligence is a sophisticated Claude skill designed to transform dense research content—including academic papers, articles, and multimedia transcripts—into structured, actionable knowledge. By employing specialized extraction patterns, it enables users to perform deep methodology assessments, evaluate the validity of claims, and synthesize complex information into clear insights, significantly accelerating the literature review and fact-checking process.

Use Cases

  • Academic Literature Review: Deeply analyze scientific papers to assess methodology, findings, and limitations while automatically compiling reference lists for bibliographies.
  • Fact-Checking and Claim Verification: Evaluate truth claims within articles or transcripts to identify evidence-based arguments and highlight contested or controversial viewpoints.
  • Multimedia Knowledge Synthesis: Extract 'wisdom' and key insights from non-textual sources like podcasts, YouTube videos, and meeting transcripts into structured summaries.
  • Rapid Information Triage: Use quick summarization patterns to identify core ideas and research significance before committing to a full-text deep dive.
nameresearch-intelligence
descriptionExtract insights, analyze claims, and synthesize knowledge from research content. Use when processing academic papers, articles, podcasts, videos, meeting transcripts, or any content where the goal is to extract wisdom, analyze arguments, summarize findings, or compile references. Triggers include "analyze this paper", "extract key insights", "summarize the research", "what are the main claims", "extract wisdom from", "compile references", "critique this argument".

Research Intelligence

Transform research content into actionable knowledge using structured extraction patterns.

Pattern Selection

Determine the appropriate pattern based on user intent:

Intent Pattern When to Use
Deep paper analysis analyze_paper Scientific papers requiring methodology/findings assessment
Quick paper overview summarize_paper Need key points without deep critique
Extract insights extract_wisdom Podcasts, videos, articles, general content
Evaluate arguments analyze_claims Content with truth claims requiring evidence analysis
Compile citations extract_references Building bibliographies, literature reviews
Identify key ideas extract_ideas Brainstorming, concept extraction
Find controversies extract_controversial_ideas Identifying contested viewpoints

Decision flow:

  1. Is it a scientific paper?analyze_paper (deep) or summarize_paper (quick)
  2. Does it contain claims to verify?analyze_claims
  3. Need citations/references?extract_references
  4. General content for insights?extract_wisdom

Pattern Execution

Each pattern follows the Fabric structure. Load the appropriate reference file, then apply its IDENTITY, STEPS, and OUTPUT format to the user's content.

Core Patterns

See references/ for full pattern definitions:

Output Guidelines

  • Use bulleted lists for extracted items (not numbered)
  • Never repeat ideas, insights, or quotes
  • Don't start consecutive items with the same words
  • Match output verbosity to user's apparent needs
  • For papers: always note limitations and methodology quality

Chaining Patterns

Offer logical follow-ups after completing a pattern:

  • After analyze_paper → offer extract_references for bibliography
  • After extract_wisdom → offer to create flashcards or summary
  • After analyze_claims → offer to find supporting/contradicting evidence