testing-flexible
Use when implementing features to write effective tests. Encourages test-first but allows prototyping.
When & Why to Use This Skill
This Claude skill enables a balanced approach to software testing, promoting high-quality code through effective test-first strategies while maintaining development velocity during prototyping. It provides structured guidance for identifying critical test paths, implementing the Red-Green-Refactor cycle, and managing tests across different development stages and languages like TypeScript and Swift.
Use Cases
- Implementing complex business logic and data transformations that require high reliability and comprehensive edge-case coverage.
- Reproducing and fixing software bugs by writing regression tests first to ensure the issue is resolved and won't reappear.
- Accelerating the exploration phase of a project by using 'Prototype Mode' to iterate quickly without the overhead of immediate test maintenance.
- Securing public API surfaces and authentication flows by establishing robust automated test suites and contract validation.
- Refactoring legacy codebases with confidence using the Red-Green-Refactor pattern to improve code structure without breaking existing functionality.
| name | testing-flexible |
|---|---|
| description | Use when implementing features to write effective tests. Encourages test-first but allows prototyping. |
Flexible Testing
Overview
Write tests for critical paths and complex logic. Test-first is encouraged but not mandatory.
Core principle: Tests should give you confidence, not slow you down.
When to Use
Strong recommendation (test-first):
- Complex business logic
- Edge cases and error handling
- Security-critical code
- Bug fixes (test reproduces bug first)
- Public API surfaces
Optional (test-after or skip):
- UI/view code that changes frequently
- Prototype/exploration phase
- Configuration and setup
- Generated code
- Simple CRUD operations
Two Modes
Production Mode (Default)
Write tests for critical functionality. Test-first encouraged.
1. Write failing test for critical behavior
2. Implement minimal code to pass
3. Add tests for edge cases
4. Refactor with confidence
Prototype Mode
Exploring ideas? Skip tests temporarily.
1. Build the prototype
2. Get feedback, iterate
3. Once design is stable: write tests
4. Or: throw away prototype, rebuild with tests
To enter prototype mode: Tell Claude "I'm prototyping" or "skip tests for now"
What to Test
Always Test
| Area | Why |
|---|---|
| Business logic | Core value of your app |
| Data transformations | Easy to get wrong |
| API responses | Contract with clients |
| Auth/permissions | Security critical |
| Error handling | Users will hit edge cases |
Consider Testing
| Area | When |
|---|---|
| UI components | When logic is complex |
| Integration points | When external APIs involved |
| Performance | When SLAs matter |
Usually Skip
| Area | Why |
|---|---|
| UI layout | Changes frequently, hard to test |
| Third-party code | Already tested |
| Trivial getters/setters | No logic to test |
| Generated code | Trust the generator |
Test-First Pattern
When you do write test-first, follow RED-GREEN-REFACTOR:
RED - Failing Test
test('retries failed operations 3 times', async () => {
let attempts = 0;
const operation = () => {
attempts++;
if (attempts < 3) throw new Error('fail');
return 'success';
};
const result = await retryOperation(operation);
expect(result).toBe('success');
expect(attempts).toBe(3);
});
GREEN - Make It Pass
async function retryOperation<T>(fn: () => Promise<T>): Promise<T> {
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
try {
return await fn();
} catch (e) {
if (i === 2) throw e;
}
}
throw new Error('unreachable');
}
REFACTOR - Clean Up
Once tests pass, improve the code while keeping tests green.
Swift/XCTest Specifics
Basic Test Structure
import XCTest
@testable import YourApp
final class GradingServiceTests: XCTestCase {
func test_gradeReturnsScoreForValidImage() async throws {
let service = GradingService()
let result = try await service.grade(image: testImage)
XCTAssertNotNil(result.score)
XCTAssertGreaterThan(result.score!, 0)
}
func test_gradeThrowsForInvalidImage() async {
let service = GradingService()
do {
_ = try await service.grade(image: Data())
XCTFail("Expected error")
} catch {
// Expected
}
}
}
Testing Actors
func test_actorStateIsolated() async {
let service = SyncService()
// Actor methods are async
await service.sync(item: testItem)
let synced = await service.pendingItems
XCTAssertTrue(synced.isEmpty)
}
Testing @Observable
func test_authStateUpdatesOnSignIn() async throws {
let authService = AuthService()
XCTAssertFalse(authService.isAuthenticated)
try await authService.signIn(with: mockCredentials)
XCTAssertTrue(authService.isAuthenticated)
}
TypeScript/Vitest Specifics
Basic Test Structure
import { describe, it, expect } from 'vitest'
import { gradeImage } from './grading'
describe('gradeImage', () => {
it('returns score for valid image', async () => {
const result = await gradeImage(testImageBase64)
expect(result.score).toBeDefined()
expect(result.score).toBeGreaterThan(0)
})
it('throws for invalid image', async () => {
await expect(gradeImage('')).rejects.toThrow()
})
})
Testing Edge Functions
import { createClient } from '@supabase/supabase-js'
describe('process-item function', () => {
it('returns 401 without auth', async () => {
const response = await fetch(`${FUNCTION_URL}/process-item`, {
method: 'POST',
body: JSON.stringify({ itemId: '123' })
})
expect(response.status).toBe(401)
})
})
Good Tests
| Quality | Good | Bad |
|---|---|---|
| Focused | One behavior per test | test('validates, saves, and notifies') |
| Readable | Clear name describes what's tested | test('test1') |
| Independent | No shared state between tests | Tests fail in isolation |
| Fast | Milliseconds, not seconds | Slow tests get skipped |
When Tests Are Hard
If testing is painful, the design might be the problem:
| Symptom | Likely Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Need many mocks | Too coupled | Dependency injection |
| Huge setup | Complex object graph | Simplify design |
| Flaky tests | Hidden state/timing | Make dependencies explicit |
| Can't test in isolation | God objects | Break into smaller units |
Checklist Before Shipping
[ ] Critical paths have tests
[ ] Edge cases covered
[ ] Error cases handled
[ ] Tests pass
[ ] No flaky tests
Don't need 100% coverage. Need confidence in critical functionality.