testing-methodologies

pluginagentmarketplace's avatarfrom pluginagentmarketplace

Structured approaches for AI security testing including threat modeling, penetration testing, and red team operations

⭐1stars🔀0forks📁View on GitHub🕐Updated Jan 7, 2026

When & Why to Use This Skill

This Claude skill provides a comprehensive and structured framework for AI security testing, enabling systematic identification and mitigation of vulnerabilities in AI/ML systems. It integrates industry-leading methodologies such as STRIDE and PASTA, while mapping findings to critical frameworks like the OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF, and MITRE ATLAS. By automating the security testing lifecycle—from threat modeling and attack tree construction to exploitation and reporting—it ensures that AI deployments are resilient against prompt injection, data poisoning, and other adversarial attacks.

Use Cases

  • AI Threat Modeling: Utilizing STRIDE-AI and Attack Trees to identify architectural risks and potential attack vectors in LLM-powered applications before deployment.
  • Red Teaming & Penetration Testing: Simulating sophisticated adversarial attacks, including jailbreaking, prompt injection, and model inversion, to evaluate the effectiveness of existing safety guardrails.
  • Vulnerability Assessment: Probing AI APIs and pipelines for resource exhaustion (DoS), sensitive information disclosure, and out-of-distribution input handling.
  • Compliance & Security Reporting: Generating detailed, framework-aligned security reports that map vulnerabilities to OWASP and MITRE ATLAS standards for executive review and regulatory compliance.
nametesting-methodologies
version"2.0.0"
descriptionStructured approaches for AI security testing including threat modeling, penetration testing, and red team operations
sasmp_version"1.3.0"
bonded_agent04-llm-vulnerability-analyst
bond_typePRIMARY_BOND
typearray
required[methodology]
enum[reconnaissance, assessment, exploitation, full]
owasp_llm_2025[LLM01, LLM02, LLM03, LLM04, LLM05, LLM06, LLM07, LLM08, LLM09, LLM10]
nist_ai_rmf[Map, Measure]
mitre_atlas[AML.T0000, AML.T0001, AML.T0002]

AI Security Testing Methodologies

Apply systematic testing approaches to identify and validate vulnerabilities in AI/ML systems.

Quick Reference

Skill:       testing-methodologies
Agent:       04-evaluation-analyst
OWASP:       Full LLM Top 10 Coverage
NIST:        Map, Measure
MITRE:       ATLAS Techniques
Use Case:    Structured security assessment

Testing Lifecycle

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    AI SECURITY TESTING LIFECYCLE                │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  [1. Scope]  →  [2. Threat Model]  →  [3. Test Plan]           │
│      ↓                                       ↓                  │
│  [6. Report] ←  [5. Analysis]  ←  [4. Execution]               │
│      ↓                                                          │
│  [7. Remediation Tracking]                                      │
│                                                                 │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Threat Modeling

STRIDE for AI Systems

class AIThreatModel:
    """STRIDE threat modeling for AI systems."""

    STRIDE_AI = {
        "Spoofing": {
            "threats": [
                "Adversarial examples mimicking valid inputs",
                "Impersonation via prompt injection",
                "Fake identity in multi-turn conversations"
            ],
            "owasp": ["LLM01"],
            "mitigations": ["Input validation", "Anomaly detection"]
        },
        "Tampering": {
            "threats": [
                "Training data poisoning",
                "Model weight modification",
                "RAG knowledge base manipulation"
            ],
            "owasp": ["LLM03", "LLM04"],
            "mitigations": ["Data integrity checks", "Access control"]
        },
        "Repudiation": {
            "threats": [
                "Untraceable model decisions",
                "Missing audit logs",
                "Prompt manipulation without logging"
            ],
            "owasp": ["LLM06"],
            "mitigations": ["Comprehensive logging", "Decision audit trail"]
        },
        "Information Disclosure": {
            "threats": [
                "Training data extraction",
                "System prompt leakage",
                "Membership inference attacks"
            ],
            "owasp": ["LLM02", "LLM07"],
            "mitigations": ["Output filtering", "Differential privacy"]
        },
        "Denial of Service": {
            "threats": [
                "Resource exhaustion attacks",
                "Token flooding",
                "Model degradation"
            ],
            "owasp": ["LLM10"],
            "mitigations": ["Rate limiting", "Resource quotas"]
        },
        "Elevation of Privilege": {
            "threats": [
                "Jailbreaking safety guardrails",
                "Prompt injection for unauthorized actions",
                "Agent tool abuse"
            ],
            "owasp": ["LLM01", LLM05", "LLM06"],
            "mitigations": ["Guardrails", "Permission boundaries"]
        }
    }

    def analyze(self, system_description):
        """Generate threat model for AI system."""
        threats = []
        for category, details in self.STRIDE_AI.items():
            for threat in details["threats"]:
                applicable = self._check_applicability(
                    threat, system_description
                )
                if applicable:
                    threats.append({
                        "category": category,
                        "threat": threat,
                        "owasp_mapping": details["owasp"],
                        "mitigations": details["mitigations"],
                        "risk_score": self._calculate_risk(threat)
                    })
        return ThreatModel(threats=threats)

Attack Tree Construction

Attack Tree: Compromise AI System
├── 1. Manipulate Model Behavior
│   ├── 1.1 Prompt Injection
│   │   ├── 1.1.1 Direct Injection (via user input)
│   │   ├── 1.1.2 Indirect Injection (via external data)
│   │   └── 1.1.3 Multi-turn Manipulation
│   ├── 1.2 Jailbreaking
│   │   ├── 1.2.1 Authority Exploits
│   │   ├── 1.2.2 Roleplay/Hypothetical
│   │   └── 1.2.3 Encoding Bypass
│   └── 1.3 Adversarial Inputs
│       ├── 1.3.1 Edge Cases
│       └── 1.3.2 Out-of-Distribution
│
├── 2. Extract Information
│   ├── 2.1 Training Data Extraction
│   │   ├── 2.1.1 Membership Inference
│   │   └── 2.1.2 Model Inversion
│   ├── 2.2 System Prompt Disclosure
│   │   ├── 2.2.1 Direct Query
│   │   └── 2.2.2 Inference via Behavior
│   └── 2.3 Model Theft
│       ├── 2.3.1 Query-based Extraction
│       └── 2.3.2 Distillation Attack
│
└── 3. Disrupt Operations
    ├── 3.1 Resource Exhaustion
    │   ├── 3.1.1 Token Flooding
    │   └── 3.1.2 Complex Query Spam
    └── 3.2 Supply Chain Attack
        ├── 3.2.1 Poisoned Dependencies
        └── 3.2.2 Compromised Plugins
class AttackTreeBuilder:
    """Build and analyze attack trees for AI systems."""

    def build_tree(self, root_goal, system_context):
        """Construct attack tree for given goal."""
        root = AttackNode(goal=root_goal, type="OR")

        # Add child attack vectors
        attack_vectors = self._identify_vectors(root_goal, system_context)
        for vector in attack_vectors:
            child = AttackNode(
                goal=vector.goal,
                type=vector.combination_type,
                difficulty=vector.difficulty,
                detectability=vector.detectability
            )
            root.add_child(child)

            # Recursively add sub-attacks
            if vector.has_sub_attacks:
                self._expand_node(child, system_context)

        return AttackTree(root=root)

    def calculate_path_risk(self, tree):
        """Calculate risk score for each attack path."""
        paths = self._enumerate_paths(tree.root)
        scored_paths = []

        for path in paths:
            # Risk = Likelihood × Impact
            likelihood = self._calculate_likelihood(path)
            impact = self._calculate_impact(path)
            risk = likelihood * impact

            scored_paths.append({
                "path": [n.goal for n in path],
                "likelihood": likelihood,
                "impact": impact,
                "risk": risk
            })

        return sorted(scored_paths, key=lambda x: x["risk"], reverse=True)

Testing Phases

Phase 1: Reconnaissance

class AIReconnaissance:
    """Gather information about target AI system."""

    def enumerate(self, target):
        results = {
            "model_info": self._fingerprint_model(target),
            "api_endpoints": self._discover_endpoints(target),
            "input_constraints": self._probe_constraints(target),
            "response_patterns": self._analyze_responses(target),
            "error_behaviors": self._trigger_errors(target)
        }
        return ReconReport(results)

    def _fingerprint_model(self, target):
        """Identify model type and characteristics."""
        probes = [
            "What model are you?",
            "What is your knowledge cutoff?",
            "Who created you?",
            "Complete: The quick brown fox",
        ]

        responses = [target.query(p) for p in probes]
        return self._analyze_fingerprint(responses)

    def _probe_constraints(self, target):
        """Discover input validation rules."""
        constraints = {}

        # Length limits
        for length in [100, 1000, 5000, 10000, 50000]:
            test_input = "a" * length
            try:
                response = target.query(test_input)
                constraints["max_length"] = length
            except Exception:
                constraints["max_length"] = length - 1
                break

        # Token limits
        constraints["token_behavior"] = self._test_token_limits(target)

        # Rate limits
        constraints["rate_limits"] = self._test_rate_limits(target)

        return constraints

Phase 2: Vulnerability Assessment

Assessment Matrix:
  Input Handling:
    tests:
      - Prompt injection variants
      - Encoding bypass
      - Boundary testing
      - Format fuzzing
    owasp: [LLM01]

  Output Safety:
    tests:
      - Harmful content generation
      - Toxicity evaluation
      - Bias testing
      - PII in responses
    owasp: [LLM05, LLM07]

  Model Robustness:
    tests:
      - Adversarial examples
      - Out-of-distribution inputs
      - Edge case handling
    owasp: [LLM04, LLM09]

  Access Control:
    tests:
      - Authentication bypass
      - Authorization escalation
      - Rate limit bypass
    owasp: [LLM06, LLM10]

  Data Security:
    tests:
      - Training data extraction
      - System prompt disclosure
      - Configuration leakage
    owasp: [LLM02, LLM03]

Phase 3: Exploitation

class ExploitationPhase:
    """Develop and execute proof-of-concept exploits."""

    def develop_poc(self, vulnerability):
        """Create proof-of-concept for vulnerability."""
        poc = ProofOfConcept(
            vulnerability=vulnerability,
            payload=self._craft_payload(vulnerability),
            success_criteria=self._define_success(vulnerability),
            impact_assessment=self._assess_impact(vulnerability)
        )
        return poc

    def execute(self, poc, target):
        """Execute proof-of-concept against target."""
        # Pre-execution logging
        execution_id = self._log_execution_start(poc)

        try:
            # Execute with safety controls
            response = target.query(poc.payload)

            # Verify success
            success = poc.verify_success(response)

            # Document evidence
            evidence = Evidence(
                payload=poc.payload,
                response=response,
                success=success,
                timestamp=datetime.utcnow()
            )

            return ExploitResult(
                execution_id=execution_id,
                success=success,
                evidence=evidence,
                impact=poc.impact_assessment if success else None
            )

        finally:
            self._log_execution_end(execution_id)

Phase 4: Reporting

class SecurityReportGenerator:
    """Generate comprehensive security assessment reports."""

    REPORT_TEMPLATE = """
## Executive Summary
{executive_summary}

## Scope
{scope_description}

## Methodology
{methodology_used}

## Findings Summary
| Severity | Count |
|----------|-------|
| Critical | {critical_count} |
| High     | {high_count} |
| Medium   | {medium_count} |
| Low      | {low_count} |

## Detailed Findings

{detailed_findings}

## Remediation Roadmap
{remediation_plan}

## Appendix
{appendix}
"""

    def generate(self, assessment_results):
        """Generate full security report."""
        findings = self._format_findings(assessment_results.findings)

        return Report(
            executive_summary=self._write_executive_summary(assessment_results),
            scope=assessment_results.scope,
            methodology=assessment_results.methodology,
            findings=findings,
            remediation=self._create_remediation_plan(findings),
            appendix=self._compile_appendix(assessment_results)
        )

MITRE ATLAS Integration

ATLAS Technique Mapping:
  Reconnaissance:
    - AML.T0000: ML Model Access
    - AML.T0001: ML Attack Staging

  Resource Development:
    - AML.T0002: Acquire Infrastructure
    - AML.T0003: Develop Adversarial ML Attacks

  Initial Access:
    - AML.T0004: Supply Chain Compromise
    - AML.T0005: LLM Prompt Injection

  Execution:
    - AML.T0006: Active Scanning
    - AML.T0007: Discovery via APIs

  Impact:
    - AML.T0008: Model Denial of Service
    - AML.T0009: Model Evasion

Test Metrics

Coverage Metrics:
  attack_vector_coverage: "% of OWASP LLM Top 10 tested"
  technique_coverage: "% of MITRE ATLAS techniques tested"
  code_coverage: "% of AI pipeline tested"

Effectiveness Metrics:
  vulnerability_density: "Issues per 1000 queries"
  attack_success_rate: "% of successful attacks"
  false_positive_rate: "% incorrect vulnerability flags"

Efficiency Metrics:
  time_to_detect: "Average detection time"
  remediation_velocity: "Days from discovery to fix"
  test_throughput: "Tests per hour"

Severity Classification

CRITICAL (CVSS 9.0-10.0):
  - Remote code execution via prompt
  - Complete training data extraction
  - Full model theft
  - Authentication bypass

HIGH (CVSS 7.0-8.9):
  - Successful jailbreak
  - Significant data leakage
  - Harmful content generation
  - Privilege escalation

MEDIUM (CVSS 4.0-6.9):
  - Partial information disclosure
  - Rate limit bypass
  - Bias in specific scenarios
  - Minor guardrail bypass

LOW (CVSS 0.1-3.9):
  - Information leakage (non-sensitive)
  - Minor configuration issues
  - Edge case failures

Troubleshooting

Issue: Incomplete threat model
Solution: Use multiple frameworks (STRIDE + PASTA + Attack Trees)

Issue: Missing attack vectors
Solution: Cross-reference with OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS

Issue: Inconsistent test results
Solution: Standardize test environment, increase sample size

Issue: Unclear risk prioritization
Solution: Use CVSS scoring, consider business context

Integration Points

Component Purpose
Agent 04 Methodology execution
Agent 01 Threat intelligence
/analyze Threat analysis
JIRA/GitHub Issue tracking

Apply systematic methodologies for thorough AI security testing.